The FAR Encourages Communication with Industry

** This post is part of our series on how we can improve government/industry engagement to deliver better mission outcomes. In case you missed it, see our initial post!

Improving The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.201 encourages information exchanges between the government and industry from the earliest identification of a requirement through the receipt of proposals. These exchanges aim to improve the understanding of government requirements and industry capabilities, allowing potential offerors to judge whether or how they can satisfy the government’s requirements.

The FAR also encourages agencies to promote early information exchanges about future acquisitions. Techniques to promote these early information exchanges include:

·         Industry or small business conferences

·         Public hearings

·         Market research

·         One-on-one meetings with potential offerors

·         Pre-solicitation notices

·         RFIs

·         Draft RFPs

·         Pre-solicitation or pre-proposal conferences

·         Site visits

Posting an acquisition schedule spreadsheet with no actual exchange of information does not improve the acquisition process on either the government or industry side.

Moreover, the FAR clarifies that agency acquisition personnel are permitted and encouraged to engage in responsible and constructive exchanges with industry as long as those exchanges are consistent with existing laws and regulations and do not promote an unfair competitive advantage to particular firms.

Over the past 25 years, I’ve seen incremental degradation of information exchanges between government and industry:  infrequent and poorly crafted forecasts to industry, limited attendance by government program stakeholders at industry events, decreased ability to find, let alone get calls or meetings with stakeholders, and an increasing shift-right of releasing information to industry to include “no-notice RFPs” with no advanced drafts for industry comment.

With COVID, everything went parabolic, resulting in a near blackout of communications between government and industry.

Why are government stakeholders not engaging with industry early and often?

Part 3: Implementation and Benefits of ISO 56001

In our previous articles, we explored the fundamentals of ISO 56001 and its key components and structure. If you’ve followed along, you now understand that ISO 56001 isn’t just about encouraging innovation—it’s about managing it strategically, measuring its impact, and making it repeatable. But here’s the question many leaders are

Read More »

Part 2: Key Components and Structure of ISO 56001

Last week, we introduced ISO 56001, the first certifiable standard for innovation management, and discussed why it’s crucial for U.S. industry, the federal government, and national competitiveness. If you missed Part 1, I encourage you to read it first to understand the basics of ISO 56001 and how it differs

Read More »

Part 1: Understanding the Basics of ISO 56001

The United States has long been a global leader in innovation, from pioneering space exploration to revolutionizing digital technology. Yet, as global competition intensifies and disruptive technologies emerge faster than ever, it’s clear that having innovative ideas isn’t enough—we must manage innovation systematically and strategically. That’s where ISO 56001 comes

Read More »
Newsletter sign-up